Business Planing/Review of business sociability
From Internet Web School
(Created page with 'Business Planing ＞ Review of business sociability == Review of business sociability == === 1. SECTION TITLE=== === 2. SECTION TITLE=== === 3. SECTION TITLE=== == R…') |
|||
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Review of business sociability == | == Review of business sociability == | ||
| + | Examination of business sociality | ||
| - | |||
| + | ==1. Is the success of the business globally good?== | ||
| - | |||
| + | It is a challenge to remember that it is always good to make the business successful. | ||
| - | === | + | For example, even if you succeed in the arms business, you may lose a lot of lives. Who can measure the value of lost lives and assess that they are less than the profits of the arms business? It is not necessary to wait for the saying that the value of life is heavier than the earth, and no one can assess the value that humankind could have obtained if the life of each person was not taken. A great war could kill millions of people. No one can calculate the magnitude of the loss, and no one tries to calculate it. It is a ridiculous act such as calculating the profit of one's own business when such a profit and loss account cannot be made. |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==2. Some large companies have no purpose== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | A company that was initially operating for a certain purpose may become meaningless when it has that purpose due to changes in the times, and may switch to another activity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In such cases, what is the purpose of the company? It can be said that it is to continue sales for shareholders and employees. When asked by the media why they started the new business, they often answered that they thought that the manufacturing technology they had used up until now would be useful for production in the new business. | ||
| + | |||
| + | That may be the case, but if we consider the corporate purpose with a focus on technology, it becomes increasingly doubtful whether the social value of the company is good. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==3. Companies that hire many and companies that hire only a few== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Which company (manufacturing industry) is preferable? The former is A type and the latter is B type. The quantity and quality of products are the same, and the quality and quantity of raw materials used are also the same. First of all, when competing between companies, B-type companies will win unless a small number of employees are extremely paid and the manufacturing equipment is not too expensive. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, if B type is always preferable, there are many other things to consider. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The question is, is there a future for employees thrown out of A-type companies? | ||
| + | |||
| + | If not, social unrest and war are likely to occur. Inefficient but large numbers can be hired, and groups with strong political power are likely to be created. Such groups may be shunned by young people and deprive the country as a whole. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Increase productivity. That is not necessarily the supreme proposition of the world. Moderate social inefficiencies will be tolerated in future societies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Isn't it desirable from now on to have a society in which moderate B-type companies and moderate non-productive groups can coexist? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[wikipedia:Corporate social responsibility|Corporate social responsibility(Wikipedia)]] | ||
| Line 20: | Line 50: | ||
*[[wikipedia:Market_(economics)|Market (economics) (Wikipedia)]] | *[[wikipedia:Market_(economics)|Market (economics) (Wikipedia)]] | ||
*[[wikipedia:Trade|Trade (Wikipedia)]] | *[[wikipedia:Trade|Trade (Wikipedia)]] | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
Latest revision as of 13:54, 6 December 2020
Business Planing ＞ Review of business sociability
Contents |
Review of business sociability
Examination of business sociality
1. Is the success of the business globally good?
It is a challenge to remember that it is always good to make the business successful.
For example, even if you succeed in the arms business, you may lose a lot of lives. Who can measure the value of lost lives and assess that they are less than the profits of the arms business? It is not necessary to wait for the saying that the value of life is heavier than the earth, and no one can assess the value that humankind could have obtained if the life of each person was not taken. A great war could kill millions of people. No one can calculate the magnitude of the loss, and no one tries to calculate it. It is a ridiculous act such as calculating the profit of one's own business when such a profit and loss account cannot be made.
2. Some large companies have no purpose
A company that was initially operating for a certain purpose may become meaningless when it has that purpose due to changes in the times, and may switch to another activity.
In such cases, what is the purpose of the company? It can be said that it is to continue sales for shareholders and employees. When asked by the media why they started the new business, they often answered that they thought that the manufacturing technology they had used up until now would be useful for production in the new business.
That may be the case, but if we consider the corporate purpose with a focus on technology, it becomes increasingly doubtful whether the social value of the company is good.
3. Companies that hire many and companies that hire only a few
Which company (manufacturing industry) is preferable? The former is A type and the latter is B type. The quantity and quality of products are the same, and the quality and quantity of raw materials used are also the same. First of all, when competing between companies, B-type companies will win unless a small number of employees are extremely paid and the manufacturing equipment is not too expensive.
However, if B type is always preferable, there are many other things to consider.
The question is, is there a future for employees thrown out of A-type companies?
If not, social unrest and war are likely to occur. Inefficient but large numbers can be hired, and groups with strong political power are likely to be created. Such groups may be shunned by young people and deprive the country as a whole.
Increase productivity. That is not necessarily the supreme proposition of the world. Moderate social inefficiencies will be tolerated in future societies.
Isn't it desirable from now on to have a society in which moderate B-type companies and moderate non-productive groups can coexist?
Corporate social responsibility(Wikipedia)
