Documentation Technique/Documentation Sentence as Means of thinking
From Internet Web School
Documentation Technique ＞ Documentation Sentence as Means of thinking
Contents
The omissions on the idea
The person is to write a sentence even if they without intended to tell. It is cases such as check or together they thoughts, whether or not it is missing the idea. It may be a bullet practically about without a name statement.
However, do they have to note, is that the text is in the means serve to deepen the thinking, but that does not claim to be complete. For example, the passage
"Why is there a bouquet on the table?"
leads,
"Because it is my birthday today, the family would have laid it."
However, it might have bought one of the family is trying to go to the sympathy of the illness of a friend. Alternatively, it might just be entrusted next door because it was away, a gift to its neighbors.
It is easy to mistake that rather than because it is almost countless situations where results it is in this way, thinking that based on text and is an incomplete.
Problems of description
However, it is those human desires by words the pursuit of the cause. For example, everyone wants to know "Why does the rain either continue down so? ", weather forecasters will be described with such as "Because a discontinuity weather front does not move". However, such a description is almost synonymous "rain clouds do not leave," said it has not been such as to explain. However, many people will be convinced by it.
Problem of description of this kind is that even cheat its place, it has not been a real explanation.
(A) Also require a description, such as "Why does not weather front the inability to move?
It might be said that "Because the westerlies are down to the south" is, and it "Because low pressure does not move." However, we must say that it is also caused by "Because of the La Nina phenomenon." Moreover, it is caused by "Because of the effect of global warming", and so on. Many people do not pinch the objection after trace back the cause to the point. However, it goes back to the source is a necessary condition but not sufficient.
(B) Ensure no exception in the chain of cause and effect, such as "Whether the rain is always falling when weather front is there?"
It must be verified that it is not the case that if there is an exception. This confirmation would be a daunting task when an exception is diverse.
(C) Still not enough reason even though to show a chain of results and cause
There may be a phenomenon such as to cancel the chain. For example, there is a play called "Dominoes".
Now, 99 pieces of domino are arranged well. Let's think of "Could 50 pieces of domino exactly fall after you fall first piece of domino?"
However, by doing just reasoning in the direction Domino fall behind, this description does not refer to the phenomenon of the opposite side. This chain fall at the 50th domino stalls, for example, in the defeat to forward the 99th at the moment someone is knocked down is the first piece. That is to say also a phenomenon that a factor of the inverse can not occur, it is not the correct inference.
(D) Definitely no incorrect logical sentence included
A common it is that it would put an incorrect assumption, such as "The prosecutor has a hard time like blurring of the day and night blood to hate the fraud of the world, to achieve justice," "The prosecutor is a fraud himself and therefore impossible." They've slipped conclusion into a premise.
Sophistry
There is a lot of other logical biological sentence error-prone due to ignorance or deliberate. It is called "Sophism" and in the following example of a lot of these.
That said there is a variety of risk, sentence is useful as a tool of thought. It would help that they organize and understand the situation calmly, to discover such hidden problems. However, do not be careful problem (A) and (D) of the time on whether or not lurking. If not, it is that fear that not only deceive themselves, to deceive the people that, there, leading to destruction of the life of the self often.
Wrong logic (why airplane Toka, or fly, why can Toka or rainbow) is on the statement of school textbooks. It is also fully terrible sophistry words of politicians. Remarks intellectuals of many to come out in the media also, sentences of an editorial of the newspaper also this is the case. There is no choice but to wear a force that each person see through the lie of them short.
Moreover, most importantly it than it is a name statement sentences for thinking that, not accidentally to casuistry (including (A) (B) also (C)) in the above sense.
